TAG Meeting 2016-11-03

Primary topic was controlling fragmentation due to releases of Data Standard and ODS

Quarterly release of ODS may exacerbate the problem
There is vendor push back on API changes
SEAs looking to a annual yearly model. with a system published in early summer
Can an annual certification process be a possible solution?
What is the LEA cycle?
LEAs should follow the SEA schedule because that is the strongest lever point for the market; with SIS vendors -we need to avoid creating a community where vendors serve too many masters". Standardizing is a priority. SEA cycles are also very stable - changes during the cycle is rare (Katrina Hurricane cited as an example). Vendors are used to that cadence - interim releases focused on the host side are OK, but annual release in time for next DS is the optimal medium
There was some question on the value of n-1 API support. There was also a feel that it addresses a very real issue around the logistics of "flipping a switch" at a certain date/time - makes the transition "more sane."
Highlight breaking changes to APIs better than in past. This is a simple thing to do, but it means a lot. In the past vendors have been caught by the changes.
Possibility of funding migration grants for adopters - creates incentive to act
Forward Compatibility idea - have any TAG members ever seen anything like this? Answer: no.

TAG Membership topic

Notes looked OK to TAG
One omission was the possibility of formal decisions through voting process, which as raised in September

Ed-Fi Governance