Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Participants

Expand


First NameLast NameOrganization
JoshAllenDenver Public Schools
ArianaBauerCPSI
JoshBergmanSkyward
KathleenBrowningEd-Fi Alliance
DavidClementsEd-Fi Alliance
DonDaileyKeen Logic
EdwardDedicPowerSchhol
RoshDhanawadeEducation Analytics
FrankFerlainoEdsembli
StephenFuquaEd-Fi Alliance
JasonGainesKeen Logic
NateGandomiEd-Fi Alliance
GregGilmanJMC
Jean-FrancoisGuertinEdWire
VirgilHretcanuNW Regional ESD
JayKaiserEducation Analytics
SherodKeenKeen Logic
VinayaMayyaEd-Fi Alliance
OscarOrtegaEdupoint Eudcational Systems
KristiPruettRenaissance
KirkPrybilACT
TomReitzEducation Analytics
AndrewRiceEducation Analytics
MarkTenHoorEducation Analytics
MaureenWentworthEd-Fi Alliance

Support: Ann Su, Ed-Fi Alliance

Agenda

  • Query Support
    • Searching: e.g. GET /ed-fi/studentSchoolAssociations?studentUniqueId=ABCXYZ
    • Selectors
    • Paging
  • HTTP Status Codes
  • Security
    • Authentication
    • Authorization
    • Non-repudiation

Materials

View file
nameAPI Standards SIG - August 2023.pdf
height250

Notes

Query Support

  • (tick) Removing note about "other operators": no comments / no concerns raised.
  • Searching
    • Natural keys: yes, several are using it for retrieving IDs, especially before PUT / DELETE (not storing the POST response for future use)
    • (error) Can different Ed-Fi API's have different query keys? No - at least for the natural keys, need to have standard forms - having variation (e.g. today's ODS/API vs. Meadowlark) would be expensive to handle from an API client application standpoint.
    • Furthermore, when a natural key is merged from multiple resources, how would the API client decide which path to take. Could take any, but why force a decision?
    • Example: 
      Image Added
      • ODS/API allows
        • ?schoolId=1234
        • ?schoolYear=2023
      • Meadowlark allows
        • ?schoolReference.schoolId=1234 or ?calendarReference.schoolId=1234
        • ?schoolYearTypeReference.schoolYear=2023 or ?calendarReference.schoolYear=2023
    • (warning) Conclusion: Meadowlark and other API instances need to conform to ODS/API at least for natural key queries
    • (tick) Add support for querying Descriptors
  • Selectors
    • In theory could be useful, but not implemented in ODS/API today
    • Can solve with Profiles in ODS/API, but not with Meadowlark right now.
    • (tick) No objections raised to removing
  • Paging
    • Need to continue supporting LIMIT... OFFSET... where possible
    • The API should be able to limit this to avoid overuse that could cause them database performance problems 
      • (tick) Make it a SHOULD not a MUST to allow special situations
    • Would like to have more efficient keyset / cursor based paging. (tick) COULD have, gradually introduce and maybe get more strict in the future
  • Ordering
    • Proposal to add a (tick) COULD or SHOULD (question) have requirement for supporting ordering
      • Need to experiment with both ODS/API and Meadowlark to see what is feasible
      • If "could" only, then find a way to declare availability in version endpoint and/or Open API specification
    • Use same key name as found in the search
    • Also a direction (ASC/DESC), and it needs to be by field if allowing sorting by multiple fields

HTTP Status Codes

  • (tick) No  concerns expressed about further opening up the status codes

Security

  • User-level
    • (tick) No objections expressed to removing this language, emphasize that the user interface should further limit for users.
    • Three-legged OAuth
    • User authorization
    • User roles
    • Internal User Authorization
  • Authorization
    • Meadowlark's current style is extremely limited, does not allow (for example) an Assessment provider to check and see if a Student (created by SIS) exists.
      • But still need to have some limits, i.e. by educationOrganizationId.
    • Meadowlark style not expected to be useful for states. And (warning) even some LEA's use claimsets with some customization.
    • (warning) Important to maintain restriction by domain, for example not letting a SIS post to an assessment.
    • (question) External User Authorization - not sure that I'm (StephenF) understanding the implications.
      • I think this is about the client application further restricting the data in ways that the Ed-Fi API can't/won't do. Cleanup the language.
    • Grade Level is another parameter that could be useful for restricting access. Example: an assessment provider only able to access 8th grade students.
  • Non-repudiation
    • (warning) Need to carefully study if/how this can be achieved in ODS/API 7.0 and in Meadowlark, and make sure there is good documentation around this type of logging.
    • (question) Is there a way to hack it in prior ODS/API?

New Questions

  • Case sensitivity: PostgreSQL does not support by default, and you lose something when you enable it.
    • Will bring conversation to the next meeting.
  • Statement that SSL is required
    • What about internal only systems?

Next meeting: 2023-09-28

Agenda:

  • Strictness
    • JSON payload (already discussed)
    • Time component of a dateTime field
    • URL and query string key case sensitivity
    • Query string value case sensitivity
  • Optimistic concurrency via etags
  • ODS/API features - which should be mentioned in API standards?
    • Profiles
    • Extensions
    • Change Queries
    • Link
    • XSD files
    • Composites
    • Identity pass-through
  • New feature requests
    • Delete by natural key
    • Proposal for ORDER BY