Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Participants

  • Marcos Alcozer, InnovateEDU
  • Britto Augustine, Arizona Department of Education
  • David Clements Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Rohith Chintamaneni Arizona Department of Education
  • Thomas Christensen Wisconsin DPI
  • Rosh Joshua Dhanawade Indiana University INsite
  • Stephen Fuqua Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Jean-Francois Guertin EdWire
  • Jason Hoekstra Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Matthew Jackson Spring Branch ISD
  • Eric Jansson Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Erik Joranlien Education Analytics
  • Eshwar Kedari Georgia Department of Education
  • Shannon Kerlick Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Vinaya Mayya Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Jim McKay Certica Solutions
  • Jeffrey Miller Greenville County Schools
  • Chris Moffatt Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Lee Morrow Headspring
  • Troy Neal Spring Branch ISD
  • James Phifer Greenville County Schools
  • Doug Quinton PowerSchool Group LLC
  • John Raub Wisconsin DPI
  • Josh Reimer Skyward
  • Andrew Rice Education Analytics
  • Jim Robertson PowerSchool Group LLC
  • J. Pablo Rodriguez San Diego County Office of Education
  • Audrey Shay Wisconsin DPI
  • Sayee Srinivasan Ed-Fi Alliance
  • John Watson San Diego County Office of Education
  • Patrick Yoho InnovateEDU

Agenda

  1. TAG topics (from November poll)
    1. Data validation and data quality - current and future roadmap
    2. More on Data Out (incl. streaming and pub/sub)
    3. Joining data from heterogenous systems / record ownership
  2. Review of major efforts around data validation and data quality (30 mins)
    1. State Education Agency "canonical" architecture: Canonical State Ed-Fi Architecture.pptx
    2. Validations API - background materials can be found here:
      1. Validation API - original presentation from 2018 Technical Congress
      2. Ed-Fi Validation API Design
    3. Exchange contributions
      1. Ed-Fi Data Checker
  3. Soliciting interest in Data Import Design reviews (10 mins/Jason Hoekstra)
  4. "More on Data Out" - Next Steps (discussion) (15 mins)
  5. "Joining data from heterogenous systems / record ownership" - Next Steps (discussion) (15 mins)

Materials

Original TAG poll (Google Sheets)

Notes

I. Updates

  • End of TAG year; refresh TAG membership in March/April by open application.

II. Data validation and data quality - current and future roadmap

Current state data quality efforts:

  • SEA use case reviewed (see canonical architecture image).
  • Some variation in how databases are split, how validations are performed, etc.

Validations API

  • background materials can be found here: Validation API - original presentation from 2018 Technical Congress
  • agreement on the potential value to this by TAG members, generally bringing validation closer to the source
  • needs filtering/authorization to accommodate multi-tenant systems

Open Source rules Engine

III. Soliciting interest in Data Import Design reviews 

  • Asking TAG & data import users to provide inputs to design in Tech Docs: Ed-Fi Technical Designs- Data Import
  • Several TAG members agreed to join subgroup
  • Side note on the tech -- interest n the notion that the output of data import can be stored as json packets in a data lake before edfi injest. Response: There is intent to bring this work (done for the back to school dashboard) into the core Data Import tool. @jason - let's touch on this next week as well?

IV. "Joining data from heterogeneous systems / record ownership" - Next Steps 

  • If SIS is not the source system, issue with record ownership when data is transferred from different systems.
  • Managing security and authorization a problem area as well
  • Not enough time to cover - cover at next meeting

Next meeting: Thursday 1/21/2021, 3:00-4:15pm CT

  • Jim - add a ping for multi-tenancy discussion