Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Participants

  • Marcos Alcozer, InnovateEDU
  • Britto Augustine, Arizona Department of Education
  • David Clements Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Rohith Chintamaneni Arizona Department of Education
  • Thomas Christensen Wisconsin DPI
  • Rosh Joshua Dhanawade Indiana University INsite
  • Stephen Fuqua Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Jean-Francois Guertin EdWire
  • Jason Hoekstra Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Matthew Jackson Spring Branch ISD
  • Eric Jansson Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Erik Joranlien Education Analytics
  • Eshwar Kedari Georgia Department of Education
  • Shannon Kerlick Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Vinaya Mayya Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Jim McKay Certica Solutions
  • Jeffrey Miller Greenville County Schools
  • Chris Moffatt Ed-Fi Alliance
  • Lee Morrow Headspring
  • Troy Neal Spring Branch ISD
  • James Phifer Greenville County Schools
  • Doug Quinton PowerSchool Group LLC
  • John Raub Wisconsin DPI
  • Josh Reimer Skyward
  • Andrew Rice Education Analytics
  • Jim Robertson PowerSchool Group LLC
  • J. Pablo Rodriguez San Diego County Office of Education
  • Audrey Shay Wisconsin DPI
  • Sayee Srinivasan Ed-Fi Alliance
  • John Watson San Diego County Office of Education
  • Patrick Yoho InnovateEDU

Agenda

  1. TAG topics (from November poll)
    1. Data validation and data quality - current and future roadmap
    2. More on Data Out (incl. streaming and pub/sub)
    3. Joining data from heterogenous systems / record ownership
  2. Review of major efforts around data validation and data quality (30 mins)
    1. State Education Agency "canonical" architecture: Canonical State Ed-Fi Architecture.pptx
    2. Validations API - background materials can be found here:
      1. Validation API - original presentation from 2018 Technical Congress
      2. Ed-Fi Validation API Design
    3. Exchange contributions
      1. Ed-Fi Data Checker
  3. Soliciting interest in Data Import Design reviews (10 mins/Jason Hoekstra)
  4. "More on Data Out" - Next Steps (discussion) (15 mins)
  5. "Joining data from heterogenous systems / record ownership" - Next Steps (discussion) (15 mins)

Materials

Original TAG poll (Google Sheets)

Notes

I. Updates

  • End of TAG year; refresh TAG membership in March/April by open application.

II. Data validation and data quality - current and future roadmap

Current state data quality efforts:

  • SEA use case reviewed (see canonical architecture image).
  • Some variation in how databases are split, how validations are performed, etc.

Validations API

  • background materials can be found here: Validation API - original presentation from 2018 Technical Congress
  • agreement on the potential value to this by TAG members, generally bringing validation closer to the source
  • needs filtering/authorization to accommodate multi-tenant systems

Open Source rules Engine

III. Soliciting interest in Data Import Design reviews 

  • Asking TAG & data import users to provide inputs to design in Tech Docs: Ed-Fi Technical Designs- Data Import
  • Several TAG members agreed to join subgroup
  • Side note on the tech -- interest n the notion that the output of data import can be stored as json packets in a data lake before edfi injest. Response: There is intent to bring this work (done for the back to school dashboard) into the core Data Import tool. @jason - let's touch on this next week as well?

IV. "Joining data from heterogeneous systems / record ownership" - Next Steps 

  • If SIS is not the source system, issue with record ownership when data is transferred from different systems.
  • Managing security and authorization a problem area as well
  • Not enough time to cover - cover at next meeting

Next meeting: Thursday 1/21/2021, 3:00-4:15pm CT

  • Jim - add a ping for multi-tenancy discussion