...
Discussion of the problem we are trying to solve of sharing mappings and the ambiguity of a charter for the work
Drive agency buy-in?
Drive vendor buy-in and ownership?
Importance of governance tooling as a way of presenting agencies and others with mappings while not being embedding them in the technical details
Proposal: get MSPs to agree on 1 assessment mapping as as a path forward?first step
Discussion and agreement on difficulty to create a simple UI for this work mapping data (part of the problem solved by the ESP tools)
Open question of if this work might forcing mappings on Assessment assessment vendors - is that OK?
One perspective is that they these vendors can contribute to that mappingthose mappings
Another is that they should own the actual API implementation - that is the key step to having a voice in the mapping
Regardless: the concept is that we want them to be part of the community governance process that is being community-governed specifications
A way to work with 1EdTech on vendor/product IDs for the from their registry?
The agreed upon direction was generally to get the MSP community sharing mappings first, then think about growth elsewhere to other adjacent issues (see abovelike agency buy-in). On this, see actions below.
...
EA to share a YAML file for 1 one assessment - NWEA Map Growth
EA to present a how mapping decisions were made for that spec, with discussion
(Ed-Fi) At the December MSP SIG, ask the questions:
do MSPs like the YAML technology as a means of sharing mappings?
do MSPs like the MAP Growth mapping provided?
...