SIS SIG - Meeting 18 - 2025.09.16

SIS SIG - Meeting 18 - 2025.09.16

Participants

First Name

Last Name

Organization

Nathan

Gandomi

Ed-Fi Alliance

Maria

Ragone

Ed-Fi Alliance

Turab

Fatakdawala

PowerSchool

Sam

Hodge

Focus

Oscar

Ortega

Edupoint

Carrie

Coey

Skyward

Megan

VanDeventer

Skyward

Meg

Morgan

Jupiter

Jen

Sauro

Infinite Campus

Matt

Hoffman

Aeries

Agenda

  • NACHOS update: complexity & scorecard refinement

  • Ed-Fi OneRoster API

  • Common issues across states and hubs


Key Takeaways

1. NACHOS Update: Complexity & Scorecard Refinement

  • The NACHOS scoring methodology was presented by Maria Ragone from the Ed-Fi Alliance. It aims to be a baseline measure of complexity by estimating the aggregate of business logic added to Ed-Fi implementations.

  • The current NACHOS scorecard was acknowledged as a helpful relative measure, but members noted that the 1–3 scoring system did not represent actual implementation effort.

  • Concerns were raised that the scorecard does not capture complexity in core elements or cross-domain logic, which can misrepresent the true level of effort required.

  • Vendors highlighted that implementation effort varies significantly across SIS platforms, making standard scoring difficult.

  • There was general agreement that extensions—especially poorly scoped ones—add unnecessary burden, and that business logic should be considered even when no calculation is involved.

  • Extensions (even necessary ones) should not be scored as zero—there is effort involved.

  • Business logic on core elements adds significant complexity and needs to be represented.

  • States may impose calculations on SIS vendors that could be handled centrally by the state.

  • Next steps include:

    • Incorporating cross-domain calculations and core element complexity into future scoring.

    • Improve evaluation of necessary vs unnecessary extensions

    • Communicating clearly to states what aspects of complexity are measured—and what are not.

    • Heads-up: Follow-up meetings are being scheduled with Maria (Summit) to discuss how to improve the usefulness of the analysis.


2. Ed-Fi OneRoster API

  • Question about how metadata would be communicated through the API. No specific proposals were made, but the need for clarity was acknowledged

  • Gradepassback was flagged as a challenge due to the high variability and custom implementations across SIS vendors. Many have built their own solutions around OneRoster, and there is hesitation about standardizing this functionality.

  • The group agreed to reconvene in October to:

    • Review the roadmap for Ed-Fi OneRoster API.

    • Explore governance participation and testing opportunities.

    • Provide feedback on metadata and gradepassback needs.

       


  1. Common Issues Across States and Hubs

  • This topic was deferred to October meeting due to time constraints

  • Topics to be addressed include spec instability, opaque goveranance, dual reporting, legacy system persistence, and others.


Looking Ahead

  • Come to Summit! October 6-8 in San Antonio. Register here.

  • Next meeting: October 21, 11:00am CT