Resources
Domain-Driven Design
The Resources that are used by an Ed-Fi API are compositions of entities, attributes, and associations. Resources are domain aggregates that have been identified from the Ed-Fi Unifying Data Model (UDM) according to the principles of Domain-Driven Design (DDD). Use cases and events in the domain typically center on individual domain aggregates.
Domain aggregates are organized along transactional boundaries, where the data contained should "live" and "die" together. For example, the Discipline Incident domain aggregate contains details about a discipline incident, and also captures data related to the behaviors and students involved. A Discipline Action is not generally captured at the same time as the Discipline Incident. Therefore, each is separated into its own domain aggregate.
Each domain aggregate has an aggregate root. An aggregate root is an entity (and in some cases an association) that includes other entities, their attributes, and associations. The subordinate entities, attributes, and associations of a domain aggregate are not directly accessible and can only be referenced through the aggregate root.
Most entities in the Ed-Fi UDM are aggregate roots (e.g., Student, School, Course). They contain no other entities. In some cases, an association that represents a significant domain concept is also represented as an aggregate root. For example, the StudentSchoolAssociation is represented as an aggregate root because it reflects enrollment.
In the table below, the domain aggregate for a Course is constructed from a number of course-related entities in the Ed-Fi UDM. A complete list of Resources is included in the Ed-Fi API specification documents.
Table 1. Sample Domain Aggregate
Domain Aggregate | Entities |
---|---|
Course | Course |
| CourseCompetencyLevel |
| CourseGradeLevel |
| CourseIdentificationCode |
| CourseLearningObjective |
| CourseLearningStandard |
| CourseLevelCharacteristic |
Resource Identifiers
Each resource exposed by an Ed-Fi API must be referenced by an internally-assigned unique identifier. While the specific algorithm for generating these identifiers is not prescribed in these guidelines, the identifiers could be generated using a UUID implementation such as Microsoft's GUID (globally unique identifier). In all cases, the identifier must be represented as a string with max length 255 characters.
An Ed-Fi API should generate unique identifiers for its clients, and should not accept client-generated identifiers when inserting or updating data. This unique identifier must be immutable: it does not change on modification of a document. An individual resources must be accessible by GET request using a URI of the form {resourceURI}/{id}
.
Natural Keys
All resources must be created with and also be retrievable by one or more externally defined key values that uniquely identify an individual resource. Those values must be natural keys of the resource. For example, a Session is uniquely identified by the Session Name, School Year, and a reference to a School. These are the natural key values, as opposed to a synthetic key like "Session ID". Resources must be accessible by natural key values using the standard HTTP GET query string search syntax:
{resourceURI}?{keyField1}={value1}&{keyField2}={value2}
PUT, PATCH, and DELETE operations must be identified using their URI (i.e., {resourceURI}/{id}
). PUT, PATCH, and DELETE operations should also be identifiable using their natural key values.
See Validation of Natural and Foreign Keysarchived for additional requirements for handling natural keys on a resource and foreign keys to other resources.
Education Organizations
The Ed-Fi UDM contains an abstract entity called EducationOrganization. This entity does not exist in the Ed-Fi API specifications. Instead, it provides a common set of properties that other entities inherit. For example, EducationOrganization has a property called nameOfInstitution
. All entities that inherit from EducationOrganization ("child entities") automatically have the nameOfInstitution
property, without needing to redefine that property on the child entity.
EducationOrganization has one property that must be handled carefully in any Ed-Fi API: the educationOrganizationId
. This value must be unique across all child entities. Furthermore, this value receives a different property name for each child entity.
For example, LocalEducationAgency and School both inherit from EducationOrganization. Respectively, they have properties localEducationAgencyId
and schoolId
, which are educationOrganizationId
values, albeit by a different name. The uniqueness constraint means this: if there is a LocalEducationAgency with localEducationAgencyId = 123
, then there must not also exist a School with schoolId = 123
.
The necessity of this requirement becomes more apparent when looking at the /ed-fi/studentEducationOrganizationAssociation
resource in the Ed-Fi Resources API specification. This resource describes a single student in relation to a single EducationOrganization. A student can thus have multiple records in this resource: one each for LocalEducationAgency, School, or any other child object of EducationOrganization. If the <childEntity>Id
value were allowed to repeat, then it would be impossible to determine which specific child resource is intended.
The following snippet comes from a single StudentEducationOrganizationAssociation document. The value 255901
must uniquely describe a single EducationOrganizationAssociation.
{
"id": "bb82e4c1433547f3bedf97c133e8148a",
"educationOrganizationReference": {
"educationOrganizationId": 255901
},
"studentReference": {
"studentUniqueId": "604824"
},
...
}
Resource Extensions
The Ed-Fi UDM can be extended to augment the structure of existing entities or create entirely new entities (cf Ed-Fi Data Standard Extension Frameworkarchived). In the context of an Ed-Fi REST API, these are called resource extensions. Consumers of an Ed-Fi REST API interact with resource extensions just as they interact with other Resources. For example, if the Student resource has been extended in the data model supported by the API platform host, an API consumer requesting a student will receive the extended resource.
An Ed-Fi API resource must follow a specific pattern for extensibility in its structure in order to distinguish extension attributes from native attributes. Extensions must be denoted by use of the reserved term _ext
and namespaced. For API users, this both clearly distinguishes these attributes from native attributes that originate from the UDM, and provides (via the namespace) information as to the origin or governance of the extension. The example below shows the JSON for a Staff resource that has been extended using a _grandbend_
namespace.
{
"id": "string",
"staffUniqueId": "string",
...
"yearsOfPriorProfessionalExperience": 0,
"yearsOfPriorTeachingExperience": 0,
"_ext": {
"grandbend": {
"probationCompleteDate": "2019-05-14",
"tenured": true
}
}
}
Likewise, new domain aggregates created via extensions must follow a similar pattern by using the namespace in the path of the new resource.
The example below shows the path for resources in the _ed-fi_
and _grand-bend_
namespaces.
It is not recommended that namespaces be fully dereferenceable URIs due to the complications in the path and resource models that this would create. Rather, namespaces are intended to be lightweight. If public repositories of namespaces exist for Ed-Fi-aligned APIs, the creator of an extension should register that namespace.
Descriptors
Ed-Fi resources utilize Descriptors to enumerate small sets of valid values for some elements. This enumeration ensures higher quality in the data compared to allowing free-text strings. For example, a student can be associated with one or more languages. The list of languages is specified in the languageDescriptors
. Each descriptor has a namespace
and codeValue
. These two are combined into {namespace}#{codeValue}
when filling in a Descriptor value on a resource.
Example: the Aromanian language with codeValue rup
is in the uri://ed-fi.org/LanguageDescriptor
namespace. When assigning a language to a student, an API client uses the string uri://ed-fi.org/LanguageDescriptor#rup
.
See Ed-Fi Descriptorsarchived for more information on use and management of Descriptors.
School Year
School Year is not treated like other Resources in the Ed-Fi Unifying Data Model and in the Ed-Fi Resources API. This is a legacy from earlier iterations where school year was treated as an enumerable type (similar to a Descriptor). Unlike a Descriptor, the School Year comes into a API model as a reference. Moreover, it is specially named as a TypeReference. The upshot of this unusual behavior is that an Ed-Fi API can essentially use School Year as a reference type like any other entity, ensuring referential integrity and supporting management of allowed school year values through the Resource API itself.
For example, a Calendar entity naturally is assigned to a School in a specific School Year. In the JSON request body, there is a schoolReference
. The body does not contain a plain schoolYear
- instead it contains a type reference, schoolYearTypeReference
.
In some cases, a domain entity might reference a School Year for a purpose other than storing multiple years of data. For example, a School Year might be used to indicate the future year when a student is expected to graduate. In those cases, the Unifying Data Model may give a role name to clarify the intent. For example, the API model for a Graduation Plan has a graduationSchoolYearTypeReference
instead of a schoolYearTypeReference
. The Open API specifications contain the actual API model used for data exchange; a client application built from that specification will not need to infer when a role name has been used.