A newer version of the Ed-Fi Data Standard is now available. See the Ed-Fi Technology Version Index for a link to the latest version.

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 24 Next »

About Ed-Fi Tracker

The Ed-Fi Alliance tracks issues and feature requests in JIRA. This allows the Ed-Fi Community to:

  • View work in progress
  • Vote on issues
  • Add and comment on issues
  • View code commits and pull requests related to issues

How To Information

Below are a few helpful outlines on common tasks with Ed-Fi Tracker tickets.

 Issue Tracker First-Time Login

Issue Tracker First-Time Login

To access our Issue Tracker, you will need a login. We generally use your GitHub username. See below for instructions on how to log in for the first time.

Step-by-Step Guide

  1. Go to tracker.ed-fi.org.
  2. Click the "Can't access your account?" link.
  3. Select Username, input your GitHub username and click Send.
  4. An email will arrive with a link to request a new password.

  5. If you can't log in or the e-mail does not arrive, please contact our administrator. Don't forget to tell us your e-mail and GitHub username in the request details.

You must be an Ed-Fi Licensee to be granted a login to our Tracker system. You can find licensing information on our website.

 Submit an Issue

Submit an Issue

Issues should be entered for bugs and enhancement requests for our core tech components. Questions can be posted to this forum.

Step-by-Step Guide

This section provides a walk through of submitting an issue to the Alliance.

  1. Select the project to which you want to submit your issue. See the article Technical Community Guidelines for a summary of projects and access requirements.
  2. Click the "Create" button.
  3. Select the Issue Type.

    We ask that you use the following issue types:
    • Bug - Bugs/defects you have found on the code.
    • Improvement - Suggested improvement or refactoring of the code for existing functionality.
    • Question - Request for how to information or best practices.
    • New Feature - New features with supporting use case.
  4. Enter following information:
    • Summary. A brief description of the issue.
    • Fix Version/s. The specific version, if any, affected by the issue.
    • Issue Description. Be detailed.
      • For bugs, please include the steps to reproduce the bug.
      • For improvements and questions, please include use case details.
      • For new feature requests, please include additional details of the user story (details below).
    • Attachments. Attach any screen shots and/or code that can add clarity to the issue.

Issues are assigned to the core technical team project lead. The project lead is the point of contact for code reviews and responsible for integrating pull request submissions into the Ed-Fi core code base.

 New Feature Requests User Story

New Feature Requests User Story

Writing a User Story

When submitting a feature request, it is standard practice in Agile development to do so in the form of a "user story." A user story is a simple account of a feature told from the perspective of a user that is designed to ensure that requests are communicated with the baseline data needed for a developer and others to quickly understand the feature and why it is needed. A user story look like this:

As a {type of user},

I want {goal}

because {reason}.

The parts of a user story:

  • {type of user} - Identify who the specific user type is, as in "As a classroom teacher..." or "As the system database administrator...". A not so good example would be "As a user of the software...". If there is a characteristic that is critical to understanding this user, include that too: "As a classroom teacher who is using this software for the first time...".
  • {goal} - Say what the user is trying to do or accomplish. Try to describe the interaction as an outcome or goal, and resist describing it as a series of steps. "As a classroom teacher, I want to download the assessment results in text file format...".
  • {reason} - Say why the user wants to accomplish the goal

A full example would be:

As a classroom teacher,

I want to download the assessment results in text file format

because I may not have Excel or other required software applications installed on my computer.

Entering User Stories in Tracker

When submitting a feature request in Jira, put the whole user story in the "Summary" field.  A user story is designed to be a short but effective vehicle for communicating a need at a glance so others can see what is wanted, who needs it, and why. This allows it to be understood, sorted, voted on, etc. very quickly.

Entering Descriptive Details and Acceptance Criteria in Tracker

In the "Description" field, you can add any additional details you feel are important, or make suggestions as to the best way to supply this feature. Given the user story above, you might write: "Many teachers are using Google Docs instead of Microsoft Office, so when files are downloaded in Excel format they have trouble opening them" or "I think a drop-down offering an Excel and Text file options in the left corner would be best.".

Finally, one best practice we recommend is to add to the description what is called "acceptance criteria." Acceptance criteria are suggestions designed to let the software developer know when the story is complete. To continue the example above, what if the teacher is able to download the assessment results, but her computer does not recognize the file as a text file? An acceptance criteria to fix this might look like this: 

When the file is downloaded, please ensure that it is recognized by the system as a text file and opens in the right application (e.g,. put a ".txt" on it, etc), including on my iPad.

This gives the developer who handles this story a list of specific item to test to ensure the story was completed successfully.

You may also want to use visual panels to communicate related information, tips, or things users need to be aware of.

DATASTD Tracker Ticket Status Workflow

The life of a DATASTD ticket has many phases. To help understand the process, below is the overall workflow for the DATASTD tracker project followed by a few common paths DATASTD tickets take.

OPEN

All DATASTD tracker tickets are created with the OPEN status. In this phase, the a reporter can expect from the community additional information gathering, suggested best practices or workarounds, background information, and/or clarifications, depending on the nature of the ticket. If there exists related tickets they may be linked and the community can vote on tickets they'd like to see gain more visibility. From there, they have two possible paths: Under Analysis and Closed.

UNDER ANALYSIS

Periodically the Alliance and other community groups will review suggestions for changes to the data standard. When a ticket has been selected for this process, it is moved from OPEN to UNDER ANALYSIS. These can include recommendations for new features and fixes to the existing data model and are most often grouped by the data domain (e.g. Student Enrollment, Assessment). While tickets are in this phase, contributors may add notes and comments or ask additional questions of the community in preparation of the discussion. During analysis, additional notes and recommendations for next steps will be notated in the comments as well. From here, a ticket may be moved back to OPEN or on to PLANNED FOR DEVELOPMENT.

PLANNED FOR DEVELOPMENT

Tickets that have been approved for development during the UNDER ANALYSIS phase move here. Detailed steps on what is to be implemented along with a Data Standard Version are required. It is important to note while there is a plan to develop tickets in this phase, it is not a guarantee the changes will become part of a future release. Often times during development additional requirements or unforeseen complications can arise and more information may be necessary or additional steps taken before a ticket can move forward. When this is the case, the ticket will revert to UNDER ANALYSIS. Otherwise, the ticket will move on to IN DEVELOPMENT.

IN DEVELOPMENT/READY FOR REVIEW

Tickets that are actively being developed fall into this phase. Changes are made to the model and data standard artifacts are completed and sent to the Alliance for a final review before merging those changes into a corresponding development branch. As with the previous phases, during this stage complications may arise that require changes or a hold to the development process. If this is the case, the ticket may revert back to PLANNED FOR DEVELOPMENT as adjustments to the implementation plan are made. Otherwise, the ticket will move on to SCHEDULED FOR RELEASE.

SCHEDULED FOR RELEASE

After the changes designated by a ticket are implemented and merged into the corresponding development branch in GitHub, a release is assigned to the ticket and it moves to this final phase before CLOSED.

CLOSED

There are two main ways that a ticket will end up CLOSED. The first are OPEN tickets that are resolved without requiring any further discussion or changes to the data standard. The second are tickets SCHEDULED FOR RELEASE after the release occurs. The common thread is the reported issue will have no further action taken.

Tracker Ticket Stories

Best Practices and Clarification

Summary: As a school administrator, I want to know the best way to record a student's credits to the course transcript for a course that has multiple parts.

Issue Type: Question

Fix Version/s: v3.0

Description: I would like to know how to properly record data around courses with multiple parts and student credits. Specifically, I need to address the following use cases:

  • Use Case 1 - A student was enrolled in a course with two parts offered in the Fall and Spring, passed both semesters, and earned credits for both course parts.
  • Use Case 2 - A student was enrolled in a course with two parts offered in the Fall and Spring, failed the first semester and passed the second semester, and earned credits for both course parts.
  • Use Case 3 - A student was enrolled in a course with two parts offered in the Fall and Spring, failed the first semester and passed the second semester, and earned credits for ONLY the second course part.
  • Use Case 4 - A student was enrolled in a course with two parts offered in the Fall and Spring, failed both semesters, and did not earn any credits.

Reporting a Bug

Summary: StudentProgramAttendanceEvent can have records without a corresponding StudentProgramAssociation.

Issue Type: Bug

Fix Version/s: v2.0, v2.2, v3.0, v3.1

Description: It has come to our attention that because the StudentProgramAttendanceEvent has separate references for Student, Program, and EducationOrganization, that an attendance event record can be created without the student having a StudentProgramAssociation record. Unless there is a use case where this would be necessary, we would recommend replacing the three separate references with a single StudentProgramAssociation reference instead.

New Feature Request

Summary: As a SIS vendor, I would like to request an Enrollment/Membership type on the StudentSchoolAssociation to accommodate state implementation requirements.

Issue Type: New Feature

Fix Version/s: v3.1

Description: A handful of state implementations record additional information on student enrollment/membership beyond knowing which school is the PrimarySchool for the student. We come across this need repeatedly in the field and would like to standardize how and where the information is recorded. Adding a EnrollmentTypeDescriptor with the most commonly recorded values as part of core would remove the need for extensions across multiple implementations and provide the flexibility to add custom descriptor values.



  • No labels